微信网页版

Proposed US rule barring China science collaboration sparks outcry from US scientists_我的网站

一 |     박성준 "장 대표, 길바닥에서 선동 정치 일삼아"이용우 "징계, 줄세우기로 장동혁 사당만 남아"                   장동혁 국민의힘 대표가 26일 오후 서울 여의도 국민의힘 중앙당사에서 당대표 취임 1주년 기자회견을 하고 있다. ⓒ데일리안 홍금표 기자[데일리안 = 김민석 기자] 더불어민주당이 취임 1주년을 맞은 장동혁 국민의힘 대표를 향해 "장동혁 체제 1년, 남은 건 극우 선동과 윤어게인 뿐"이라고 비판했다. 특히 6·3 지방선거 과정에서 불거진 투표 용지 부족 사태에 집중한 장 대표의 모습을 '길바닥 선동정치'로 규정하며 "대한민국 정치에 보수와 야당이 실종됐다"고 날을 세우기도 했다.박성준 민주당 수석대변인은 26일 서면 브리핑을 내어 "장 대표는 극우세력 음모론에 편승해 국회는 내팽개치고 길바닥에서 선동정치를 일삼았다"면서 "연일 망언을 일삼는 이진숙, 김태규 의원 같은 윤 어게인 세력을 공천해 국회를 '윤 어게인의 놀이터'로 만들었다"고 비판했다.박 수석대변인은 "장 대표는 반대파에게는 윤리위원회라는 칼을 휘둘러 숙청 정치를 이어가고 있다. 대한민국 정치에 보수와 야당이 실종됐다"며 "아직 장 대표에게는 1년이라는 시간이 남아 있다. 제1야당으로 본연의 역할을 다해달라"고 촉구했다.이용우 민주당 대변인도 이날 국회에서 브리핑을 열어 "장 대표의 1년은 민심과 함께하는 보수의 새 길은 없고 윤어게인 뿐이었다"고 평가 절하했다.이 대변인은 장 대표의 취임 1주년 기자회견문을 거론하며 "장 대표가 '국민 속으로 들어가 민심과 함께하는 보수의 새 길을 찾겠다'고 공언했는데 지난 1년간 장 대표의 행보는 민심과 거리가 멀었다. 장 대표가 서 있던 곳은 민생의 현장이 아닌 부정선거 음모론이 판치는 현장이었다"고 지적했다.이어 "‘이재명 정부에게 내란 몰이를 당했다'고 말했지만, 실제로는 윤어게인을 선언하며 내란을 옹호했고 보수 쇄신은커녕 극우 세력과 밀착했다"며 "장 대표가 그토록 요구했던 잠실 올림픽공원 투표소 재검표 역시 국민의힘의 몽니로 하염없이 미뤄지고 있다"고 꼬집었다.그러면서 "1년 간 국민의 삶을 챙기기보다는 정치적 갈등과 음모론에 매달리는 모습만 반복적으로 보여줘 국민을 대표해야 하는 공당은 증발했고, 징계와 줄세우기를 통한 '장동혁 사당만 남았다"며 "국회 안에서 민생을 논의하고 대안을 모색하는 책임있는 자세를 촉구한다"고 목소리를 높였다.앞서 장 대표는 이날 오전 서울 여의도 국민의힘 중앙당사에서 취임 1주년 회견을 열고 "이재명 정권이 대한민국을 무너뜨리도록 그냥 놓아둬선 안 된다"며 "2028년 총선에서 과반 승리를 거둬야 한다. 반드시 정권을 탈환해야 한다"고 강조했다.장 대표는 "지금 대한민국은 독재의 마지막 문턱에 있다"면서 "이재명 독재의 문을 열 재판 취소와 연임 개헌 시도를 국민과 함께 반드시 막아내겠다"고 덧붙였다.。    

    China US Photo:VCGAmerican scientists have voiced opposition to a proposed rule which seeks to ban federal funding for US science collaboration with China, saying that it would instead hurt US interest, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday. Chinese experts also warned that the slew of US restrictions on China-US scientific cooperation is unlikely to deal a fatal blow to China's scientific development, but could instead backfire on the US.
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post. 
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge. 
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said. 
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine. 
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation. 
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。

Current article:http://1ddx.xuanliaruamibinmilangca.shop/list_sbqb/af2sk0k.html

Published on:01:08:01